<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OSI Gazette</title>
	<atom:link href="http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2</link>
	<description>Politics. Humor. Soap.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:36:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>California passes Assembly Bill 390 (Marijuana regulation)</title>
		<link>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/288</link>
		<comments>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/288#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Edit: Malware problem fixed (I think). Ug, exploited plugin code
Hippies, liberals, and California business owners rejoice: around 10:52 AM, PST., the California Public Safety Committee passed Assembly Bill 390, the Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act, which seeks to regulate and control the production, distribution, and personal use of marijuana for adults age 21 and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/asmseal.gif" alt="" title="asmseal" width="124" height="165" style="float:right;margin:5px;" /><br />
<em>Edit: Malware problem fixed (I think). Ug, exploited plugin code</em></p>
<p>Hippies, liberals, and California business owners rejoice: around 10:52 AM, PST., the California Public Safety Committee passed Assembly Bill 390, the Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act, which seeks to regulate and control the production, distribution, and personal use of marijuana for adults age 21 and older. The goal is to tax every ounce of marijuana sold by $50. The vote passed 4-3.</p>
<p>But approach this with cautious optimism:  The bill immediately faces a separate vote in the California State Assembly Committee on Health. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/288/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giuliani the Latest Republican to Ignore 9-11</title>
		<link>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/282</link>
		<comments>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/282#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dana Perino recently made headlines when she said &#8220;We did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush&#8217;s term.&#8221; The liberal blogosphear was quick to attack, pointing out that, well, 9-11 happened in Bush&#8217;s term. Most people chalked this up to a simple miscommunication. However this appears to be a less of a mistake, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/giuliani-300x205.jpg" alt="" title="giuliani" width="300" height="205" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-283" style="float:right;margin:5px;" />Dana Perino recently made headlines when she said &#8220;We did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush&#8217;s term.&#8221; The liberal blogosphear was quick to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/25/perino-no-terrorist-attac_n_370393.html">attack</a>, pointing out that, well, 9-11 happened in Bush&#8217;s term. Most people chalked this up to a simple miscommunication. However this appears to be a less of a mistake, and more of a mindset.</p>
<p>On January 8th, 2010, Rudy Giuliani, the former Mayor of New York City and former republican candidate for President, spoke with George Stephanopoulos. Around 7:10, he emphasized that Bush kept us safe from terrorists by saying, <strong>&#8220;We had no domestic attacks under Bush. We&#8217;ve had one under Obama.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>So this theme of &#8220;ignore 9-11&#8243; seems to not be an accident, but the real way republicans view the Bush administration.</p>
<p>Watch it for yourself here: <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerindex?id=9510257" target="_blank">Rudy Giuliani ignores 9-11</a> (Interesting bit around -1:00)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/282/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans suddenly against interventionism</title>
		<link>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/281</link>
		<comments>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/281#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/?p=281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to polling data released today by the Pew Research Center, for the first time in 40 years, republicans turned sharply against global interventionism; and all it took was a democrat president pledging more troops to Afghanistan. Echoing Bush&#8217;s surge in Iraq, Obama has focused America&#8217;s attention on Afghanistan, where the unhindered Taliban has been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="float:right;margin-left:10px;margin-bottom:10px;"><img src="http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/pewresearch.jpg" /></span>According to polling data released today by the Pew Research Center, for the first time in 40 years, republicans turned sharply against global interventionism; and all it took was a democrat president pledging more troops to Afghanistan. Echoing Bush&#8217;s surge in Iraq, Obama has focused America&#8217;s attention on Afghanistan, where the unhindered Taliban has been improving it&#8217;s asymmetrical warfare tactics during the past 7 years of Bush neglect. But now that Obama&mdash;the frequent target of undermine-at-all-costs politics&mdash;has acted to squelch terrorism, Republicans struggling to find flaws suddenly (and strongly) support isolationism. For 40 years, the hallmark of republican foreign policy was acting as global police; this sentiment dissolved overnight. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/281/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Surge in Iraq and Increasing Troops in Afghanistan are not Comparable</title>
		<link>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/280</link>
		<comments>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/280#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama has announced his second escalation of U.S. forces in Afghanistan. He will send 30,000 additional troops to the region. Both liberals and conservatives are jumping on him for this; his liberal base is angry that he is increasing war efforts, while conservatives are crying hypocrisy. 
Before I continue, it&#8217;s important to remind everyone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama has announced his second escalation of U.S. forces in Afghanistan. He will send 30,000 additional troops to the region. Both liberals and conservatives are jumping on him for this; his liberal base is angry that he is increasing war efforts, while conservatives are crying hypocrisy. </p>
<p>Before I continue, it&#8217;s important to remind everyone that the only reason we need to focus on Afghanistan today is that Bush became distracted with Iraq, which allowed Al Qaeda to recruit and grow uncontested in the borders villages between Afghanistan and Pakistan. (<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/07/11/al.qaeda.report/index.html">Source</a>, <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/01/24/pakistan.qaeda/index.html">source</a>)</p>
<p>So today, when Obama wants to increase the troops in Afghanistan, not only is it not comparable to Bush, it is a direct result of Bush&#8217;s misguided goals.</p>
<p>The war in Iraq was illegal, and not sanctioned by the UN. It was motivated by greed and the desire to make money, thinly veiled and widely debunked WMD search and anti-terrorism regime change. Afghanistan is very different, there is little to no financial gain for America, and although the war is not an ideal solution to the problems caused by the instability and extremism in the region, it is wholly more moral and acceptably motivated than Iraq was.</p>
<p>More to the point, Bush&#8217;s reasoning for sending more troops into Iraq was to &#8220;do everything necessary to win, and commit everything and stay as long as possible.&#8221; Obama&#8217;s justification for increasing troops in Afghanistan is to  &#8220;get it over with so we can get out as fast as possible.&#8221;</p>
<p>These are completely different goals, both of which happen to start off with sending more troops.</p>
<p><em>Credit in part to joe_archer</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/280/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner and the other partisans</title>
		<link>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/279</link>
		<comments>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/279#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two things popped up during an otherwise quite, pre-holiday work day.
A few days ago, John Boehner, the republican minority leader, posted a letter on his website which slammed the Obama administration for stripping workers of their Right to High-Quality, Independent Investment Advice. Just for the record, there is no such thing. Boehner is an idiot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things popped up during an otherwise quite, pre-holiday work day.</p>
<p>A few days ago, John Boehner, the republican minority leader, posted a letter on his website which slammed the Obama administration for stripping workers of their Right to High-Quality, Independent Investment Advice. Just for the record, there is no such thing. Boehner is an idiot and like many of his colegues, is making things up, which leads me to point number two:</p>
<p>Conservative bloggers complained today that the Obama was the most partisan president in history. In what world are the Republicans living? They refuse to work with Obama on important issues, vote as a solid block against everything he proposes, excoriate any Republican who dares to cross the aisle, then they call Obama the &#8220;most partisan president in history.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Thanks RobinOhio1 and JustJim73</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/279/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>V &#8211; Aliens use universal healthcare to take over the world (not kidding)</title>
		<link>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/278</link>
		<comments>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/278#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a few days late,  but I just watched the first episode of V.
The plot is simple: this very charismatic alien shows up, and promises hope and change, and indoctinates all of the youth to spread their message. Meanwhile, there is a resistance of people who&#8217;ve heard the truth, that know that all of these messages [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="float:right;margin-left:10px;margin-bottom:10px;"><a href="http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/vmorenabaccarin.jpg" border="0"><img src="http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/vmorenabaccarin-sml.jpg" border="0" /></a></span>I&#8217;m a few days late,  but I just watched the first episode of V.</p>
<p>The plot is simple: this very charismatic alien shows up, and promises hope and change, and indoctinates all of the youth to spread their message. Meanwhile, there is a resistance of people who&#8217;ve heard the truth, that know that all of these messages of hope and change are just fronts for the enslavement of humanity.</p>
<p>Seriously, the script is an hour-long John McCain campaign ad.</p>
<p>The embodiment of these sentiments happens around 25 minutes in. Erica Evens, the mother, freaks out that her son is spending so much time with the V&#8217;s. She finds footage of him vandalising in the name of the saviors. When confronted (25:15),  Tyler Evans says, &#8220;The V&#8217;s&#8230;they call it &#8217;spreading hope.&#8217; &#8221; Hope! That&#8217;s the evil guise in which the invading alien race is going to brainwash the world. By spreading hope!</p>
<p>The big complaint by the republican party is that people voted for Obama not because of the needs of the country, but because the situation was so dire that America voted for an unexperienced yet charismatic candidate. Or as the anti-V resistance says it&#8230;&#8221;It worries me that they came when we needed them the most. All they&#8217;re really doing is positioning themselves as the saviors of mankind.&#8221;</p>
<p>Finally, at 37:12, the method in which the aliens will take over the world is reveiled. Anna is giving a news caster, Chad Decker, an interview. Anna exclaims: &#8221;The intent goes beyond just healing we want to provide complete medical services to all.&#8221;</p>
<p>Chad Decker (with an OMGWTF expression) responds, &#8220;You&#8217;re talking about Universal Healthcare(!!!???)&#8221;.</p>
<p>The audience goes crazy. Universal Healthcare is <em>obviouslly </em> the way in which an alien species will take over America.</p>
<p>The plot of the rest of the series is trying to convince other characters that by the time we figure this out&#8230;it&#8217;ll be too late&#8230;they&#8217;ll take over&#8230;unless we can stop them.</p>
<p>The rest of the pilot episode was a motivational rant about how the fundamentalists that are against the V&#8217;s are not crazy, and make the emotional plee that if you want to rescue the world, you have to resist these charismatic beings who want (cue dramatic music)&#8230;universal healthcare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/278/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Pro-Healthcare Reform Stickers!</title>
		<link>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/277</link>
		<comments>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/277#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Pro-Healthcare Reform Stickers! Free! Get them here:
http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/stickers
  
  
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Pro-Healthcare Reform Stickers! Free! Get them here:</p>
<p>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/stickers</p>
<p>  <a href="http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/stickers/"><img alt="Healthcare reform" src="http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/stickers/healthcare2.jpg" border=0></a></p>
<p>  <a href="http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/stickers/"><img alt="Healthcare reform" src="http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/stickers/healthcare.jpg" border=0></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/277/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News Wants You To Send Them Instances Of Media Bias</title>
		<link>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/276</link>
		<comments>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/276#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/?p=276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox News, the most biased news source on television, wants you to send them an email if you see any examples of media bias. So if you see anything on Fox News that&#8217;s biased, can report it at newswatch@foxnews.com.
(credit to News Hounds for this)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News, the most biased news source on television, wants you to send them an email if you see any examples of media bias. So if you see anything on Fox News that&#8217;s biased, can report it at newswatch@foxnews.com.</p>
<p>(credit to <a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2009/09/21/fox_news_wants_you_to_send_them_instances_of_media_bias.php">News Hounds</a> for this)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/276/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oldest 100 .com domains</title>
		<link>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/275</link>
		<comments>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/275#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Off Topic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s do a break from politics, shall we? This is a list of the 100 olders .com domains



Rank

Registration date
Domain name


1.
15-Mar-1985
SYMBOLICS.COM


2.
24-Apr-1985
BBN.COM


3.
24-May-1985
THINK.COM


4.
11-Jul-1985
MCC.COM


5.
30-Sep-1985
DEC.COM


6.
07-Nov-1985
NORTHROP.COM


7.
09-Jan-1986
XEROX.COM


8.
17-Jan-1986
SRI.COM


9.
03-Mar-1986
HP.COM


10.
05-Mar-1986
BELLCORE.COM


11.
19-Mar-1986
IBM.COM


12.
19-Mar-1986
SUN.COM


13.
25-Mar-1986
INTEL.COM


14.
25-Mar-1986
TI.COM


15.
25-Apr-1986
ATT.COM


16.
08-May-1986
GMR.COM


17.
08-May-1986
TEK.COM


18.
10-Jul-1986
FMC.COM


19.
10-Jul-1986
UB.COM


20.
05-Aug-1986
BELL-ATL.COM


21.
05-Aug-1986
GE.COM


22.
05-Aug-1986
GREBYN.COM


23.
05-Aug-1986
ISC.COM


24.
05-Aug-1986
NSC.COM


25.
05-Aug-1986
STARGATE.COM


26.
02-Sep-1986
BOEING.COM


27.
18-Sep-1986
ITCORP.COM


28.
29-Sep-1986
SIEMENS.COM


29.
18-Oct-1986
PYRAMID.COM


30.
27-Oct-1986
ALPHACDC.COM


31.
27-Oct-1986
BDM.COM


32.
27-Oct-1986
FLUKE.COM


33.
27-Oct-1986
INMET.COM


34.
27-Oct-1986
KESMAI.COM


35.
27-Oct-1986
MENTOR.COM


36.
27-Oct-1986
NEC.COM


37.
27-Oct-1986
RAY.COM


38.
27-Oct-1986
ROSEMOUNT.COM


39.
27-Oct-1986
VORTEX.COM


40.
05-Nov-1986
ALCOA.COM


41.
05-Nov-1986
GTE.COM


42.
17-Nov-1986
ADOBE.COM


43.
17-Nov-1986
AMD.COM


44.
17-Nov-1986
DAS.COM


45.
17-Nov-1986
DATA-IO.COM


46.
17-Nov-1986
OCTOPUS.COM


47.
17-Nov-1986
PORTAL.COM


48.
17-Nov-1986
TELTONE.COM


49.
11-Dec-1986
3COM.COM


50.
11-Dec-1986
AMDAHL.COM


51.
11-Dec-1986
CCUR.COM


52.
11-Dec-1986
CI.COM


53.
11-Dec-1986
CONVERGENT.COM


54.
11-Dec-1986
DG.COM


55.
11-Dec-1986
PEREGRINE.COM


56.
11-Dec-1986
QUAD.COM


57.
11-Dec-1986
SQ.COM


58.
11-Dec-1986
TANDY.COM


59.
11-Dec-1986
TTI.COM


60.
11-Dec-1986
UNISYS.COM


61.
19-Jan-1987
CGI.COM


62.
19-Jan-1987
CTS.COM


63.
19-Jan-1987
SPDCC.COM


64.
19-Feb-1987
APPLE.COM


65.
04-Mar-1987
NMA.COM


66.
04-Mar-1987
PRIME.COM


67.
04-Apr-1987
PHILIPS.COM


68.
23-Apr-1987
DATACUBE.COM


69.
23-Apr-1987
KAI.COM


70.
23-Apr-1987
TIC.COM


71.
23-Apr-1987
VINE.COM


72.
30-Apr-1987
NCR.COM


73.
14-May-1987
CISCO.COM


74.
14-May-1987
RDL.COM


75.
20-May-1987
SLB.COM


76.
27-May-1987
PARCPLACE.COM


77.
27-May-1987
UTC.COM


78.
26-Jun-1987
IDE.COM


79.
09-Jul-1987
TRW.COM


80.
13-Jul-1987
UNIPRESS.COM


81.
27-Jul-1987
DUPONT.COM


82.
27-Jul-1987
LOCKHEED.COM


83.
28-Jul-1987
ROSETTA.COM


84.
18-Aug-1987
TOAD.COM


85.
31-Aug-1987
QUICK.COM


86.
03-Sep-1987
ALLIED.COM


87.
03-Sep-1987
DSC.COM


88.
03-Sep-1987
SCO.COM


89.
22-Sep-1987
GENE.COM


90.
22-Sep-1987
KCCS.COM


91.
22-Sep-1987
SPECTRA.COM


92.
22-Sep-1987
WLK.COM


93.
30-Sep-1987
MENTAT.COM


94.
14-Oct-1987
WYSE.COM


95.
02-Nov-1987
CFG.COM


96.
09-Nov-1987
MARBLE.COM


97.
16-Nov-1987
CAYMAN.COM


97.
16-Nov-1987
ENTITY.COM


99.
24-Nov-1987
KSR.COM


100.
30-Nov-1987
NYNEXST.COM



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s do a break from politics, shall we? This is a list of the 100 olders .com domains</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr align="left" valign="top">
<td align="right">Rank</p>
</td>
<td>Registration date</td>
<td>Domain name</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">1.</td>
<td>15-Mar-1985</td>
<td>SYMBOLICS.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">2.</td>
<td>24-Apr-1985</td>
<td>BBN.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">3.</td>
<td>24-May-1985</td>
<td>THINK.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">4.</td>
<td>11-Jul-1985</td>
<td>MCC.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">5.</td>
<td>30-Sep-1985</td>
<td>DEC.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">6.</td>
<td>07-Nov-1985</td>
<td>NORTHROP.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">7.</td>
<td>09-Jan-1986</td>
<td>XEROX.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">8.</td>
<td>17-Jan-1986</td>
<td>SRI.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">9.</td>
<td>03-Mar-1986</td>
<td>HP.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">10.</td>
<td>05-Mar-1986</td>
<td>BELLCORE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">11.</td>
<td>19-Mar-1986</td>
<td>IBM.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">12.</td>
<td>19-Mar-1986</td>
<td>SUN.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">13.</td>
<td>25-Mar-1986</td>
<td>INTEL.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">14.</td>
<td>25-Mar-1986</td>
<td>TI.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">15.</td>
<td>25-Apr-1986</td>
<td>ATT.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">16.</td>
<td>08-May-1986</td>
<td>GMR.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">17.</td>
<td>08-May-1986</td>
<td>TEK.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">18.</td>
<td>10-Jul-1986</td>
<td>FMC.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">19.</td>
<td>10-Jul-1986</td>
<td>UB.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">20.</td>
<td>05-Aug-1986</td>
<td>BELL-ATL.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">21.</td>
<td>05-Aug-1986</td>
<td>GE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">22.</td>
<td>05-Aug-1986</td>
<td>GREBYN.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">23.</td>
<td>05-Aug-1986</td>
<td>ISC.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">24.</td>
<td>05-Aug-1986</td>
<td>NSC.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">25.</td>
<td>05-Aug-1986</td>
<td>STARGATE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">26.</td>
<td>02-Sep-1986</td>
<td>BOEING.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">27.</td>
<td>18-Sep-1986</td>
<td>ITCORP.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">28.</td>
<td>29-Sep-1986</td>
<td>SIEMENS.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">29.</td>
<td>18-Oct-1986</td>
<td>PYRAMID.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">30.</td>
<td>27-Oct-1986</td>
<td>ALPHACDC.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">31.</td>
<td>27-Oct-1986</td>
<td>BDM.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">32.</td>
<td>27-Oct-1986</td>
<td>FLUKE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">33.</td>
<td>27-Oct-1986</td>
<td>INMET.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">34.</td>
<td>27-Oct-1986</td>
<td>KESMAI.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">35.</td>
<td>27-Oct-1986</td>
<td>MENTOR.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">36.</td>
<td>27-Oct-1986</td>
<td>NEC.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">37.</td>
<td>27-Oct-1986</td>
<td>RAY.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">38.</td>
<td>27-Oct-1986</td>
<td>ROSEMOUNT.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">39.</td>
<td>27-Oct-1986</td>
<td>VORTEX.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">40.</td>
<td>05-Nov-1986</td>
<td>ALCOA.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">41.</td>
<td>05-Nov-1986</td>
<td>GTE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">42.</td>
<td>17-Nov-1986</td>
<td>ADOBE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">43.</td>
<td>17-Nov-1986</td>
<td>AMD.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">44.</td>
<td>17-Nov-1986</td>
<td>DAS.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">45.</td>
<td>17-Nov-1986</td>
<td>DATA-IO.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">46.</td>
<td>17-Nov-1986</td>
<td>OCTOPUS.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">47.</td>
<td>17-Nov-1986</td>
<td>PORTAL.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">48.</td>
<td>17-Nov-1986</td>
<td>TELTONE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">49.</td>
<td>11-Dec-1986</td>
<td>3COM.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">50.</td>
<td>11-Dec-1986</td>
<td>AMDAHL.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">51.</td>
<td>11-Dec-1986</td>
<td>CCUR.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">52.</td>
<td>11-Dec-1986</td>
<td>CI.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">53.</td>
<td>11-Dec-1986</td>
<td>CONVERGENT.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">54.</td>
<td>11-Dec-1986</td>
<td>DG.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">55.</td>
<td>11-Dec-1986</td>
<td>PEREGRINE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">56.</td>
<td>11-Dec-1986</td>
<td>QUAD.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">57.</td>
<td>11-Dec-1986</td>
<td>SQ.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">58.</td>
<td>11-Dec-1986</td>
<td>TANDY.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">59.</td>
<td>11-Dec-1986</td>
<td>TTI.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">60.</td>
<td>11-Dec-1986</td>
<td>UNISYS.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">61.</td>
<td>19-Jan-1987</td>
<td>CGI.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">62.</td>
<td>19-Jan-1987</td>
<td>CTS.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">63.</td>
<td>19-Jan-1987</td>
<td>SPDCC.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">64.</td>
<td>19-Feb-1987</td>
<td>APPLE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">65.</td>
<td>04-Mar-1987</td>
<td>NMA.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">66.</td>
<td>04-Mar-1987</td>
<td>PRIME.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">67.</td>
<td>04-Apr-1987</td>
<td>PHILIPS.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">68.</td>
<td>23-Apr-1987</td>
<td>DATACUBE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">69.</td>
<td>23-Apr-1987</td>
<td>KAI.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">70.</td>
<td>23-Apr-1987</td>
<td>TIC.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">71.</td>
<td>23-Apr-1987</td>
<td>VINE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">72.</td>
<td>30-Apr-1987</td>
<td>NCR.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">73.</td>
<td>14-May-1987</td>
<td>CISCO.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">74.</td>
<td>14-May-1987</td>
<td>RDL.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">75.</td>
<td>20-May-1987</td>
<td>SLB.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">76.</td>
<td>27-May-1987</td>
<td>PARCPLACE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">77.</td>
<td>27-May-1987</td>
<td>UTC.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">78.</td>
<td>26-Jun-1987</td>
<td>IDE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">79.</td>
<td>09-Jul-1987</td>
<td>TRW.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">80.</td>
<td>13-Jul-1987</td>
<td>UNIPRESS.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">81.</td>
<td>27-Jul-1987</td>
<td>DUPONT.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">82.</td>
<td>27-Jul-1987</td>
<td>LOCKHEED.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">83.</td>
<td>28-Jul-1987</td>
<td>ROSETTA.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">84.</td>
<td>18-Aug-1987</td>
<td>TOAD.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">85.</td>
<td>31-Aug-1987</td>
<td>QUICK.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">86.</td>
<td>03-Sep-1987</td>
<td>ALLIED.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">87.</td>
<td>03-Sep-1987</td>
<td>DSC.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">88.</td>
<td>03-Sep-1987</td>
<td>SCO.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">89.</td>
<td>22-Sep-1987</td>
<td>GENE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">90.</td>
<td>22-Sep-1987</td>
<td>KCCS.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">91.</td>
<td>22-Sep-1987</td>
<td>SPECTRA.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">92.</td>
<td>22-Sep-1987</td>
<td>WLK.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">93.</td>
<td>30-Sep-1987</td>
<td>MENTAT.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">94.</td>
<td>14-Oct-1987</td>
<td>WYSE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">95.</td>
<td>02-Nov-1987</td>
<td>CFG.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">96.</td>
<td>09-Nov-1987</td>
<td>MARBLE.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">97.</td>
<td>16-Nov-1987</td>
<td>CAYMAN.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">97.</td>
<td>16-Nov-1987</td>
<td>ENTITY.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">99.</td>
<td>24-Nov-1987</td>
<td>KSR.COM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">100.</td>
<td>30-Nov-1987</td>
<td>NYNEXST.COM</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/275/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making new stickers</title>
		<link>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/273</link>
		<comments>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/273#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/?p=273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey everyone!
As most of you know, before the election, we made stickers, and gave them away here http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/stickers (no longer actively giving away).
We want to do another run of stickers for the Health Care initiative. But we need suggestions on what to put on these stickers.
Like before, we&#8217;ll be giving them away for free once they&#8217;re up.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey everyone!</p>
<p>As most of you know, before the election, we made stickers, and gave them away here <a href="http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/stickers">http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/stickers</a> (no longer actively giving away).</p>
<p>We want to do another run of stickers for the Health Care initiative. But we need suggestions on what to put on these stickers.</p>
<p>Like before, we&#8217;ll be giving them away for free once they&#8217;re up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/273/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
